As the downward pressure on advising fees and profit margin continues, advisors remain on the lookout for efficiencies that may help them stay competitive and grow their practice. Advisory firms are trying out a variety of new strategies, including offering hybrid pricing solutions, digitizing more of the client experience and offering a holistic approach to advising services.
However, advisors are fundamentally in the business of relationship building, in which success still hinges upon the ability to understand their client’s investment objectives, lifestyle goals, and risk tolerance. A firm’s internal capacity for successfully lining up these client needs with the right strategic tools can play a decisive role in how or whether it taps into external resources.
Our latest research indicates that the majority of advisory firms and practices still choose to rely on their in-house competencies for investment management services -- at least for now.
The Race To Scalability 2020 sheds light on how advisors decide whether and how to engage external support to grow their firms. As part of our 10-year commitment to this knowledge area, FlexShares recently talked to over 500 respondents in the advising profession, including RIAs (33%), independent broker/dealers (35%), hybrid/dually registered RIAs (13%), regional broker/dealers (8%) and insurance broker/dealers (6%). The size of assets under management across the respondent pool ranged from under $50 million (27%) to over $3 billion (13%).
Shifting Perceptions and the Future of Outsourcing
Our data shows that the majority (60%) of advisors decide not to engage outside investment expertise. The percentage has not varied much across six surveys over the decade. However, the research also indicates that industry perceptions may be changing.
The percentage of non-outsourcing respondents saying their opinion of outside investment management “won’t change” has dropped dramatically—to 30%, down from 52% in 2010. Furthermore, the pandemic has encouraged firms that do not currently outsource to reassess their approach. When firms that handle investment management in-house were asked whether their opinion of outsourcing has changed as a result of the pandemic, 15% of respondents said they planned to increase usage of outside managers and 85% said they plan to reconsider the use of external management. While the pandemic has not triggered a significant shift towards third-party investment outsourcing to-date, it’s a growing consideration.
Supporting this shift in opinion is a growing number of advisors who indicated that investment management is not their primary value proposition. This is likely reflective of the evolution in advisors’ expected role from investment manager to holistic financial planner. Nearly a third—33% in 2020—of respondents told us they saw investment management research as their primary business proposition. Slightly higher than 32% in 2018, the percentage has been on an overall decline—from 54% in 2012, 56% in 2014, 44.6% in 2016.
As the landscape for outsourcing evolves, there were also several factors in the survey that could point to future adoption. Nearly half of 2020 respondents who didn’t outsource revealed that more affordable solutions for investment management options would make them reconsider their standing decision. The availability of a user-friendly technology platform and a broader range of outsourced investment management solutions essentially tied for second, at around 24% of respondents citing each factor.
Furthermore, advisors aren’t opposed to seeking third-party services more broadly. One-hundred percent of advisors who keep their investment management function in-house outsourced at least one non-investment area—most outsource more. Advisors are increasingly relying on external help for services such as investment product analysis, up to 66% in 2020 from 57% in 2018, reflecting advisors’ desire for support in investment selection. There is also significant growth in outsourcing their marketing function, up to 39% in 2020 from 20% in 2018. Finally, 60% of advisors indicated they rely on external help for information technology services.
External support might not be a fit for every scaling challenge or every advisor. Our survey data suggests that boutique firms might find it easier to focus on their core value proposition by keeping the business simple and the clients close. Clients with a larger client base may have more leeway to explore new products and verticals, offloading their areas of inefficiencies. But no matter the firm size, advisors may increasingly find value in leaning on external resources to spend more time creating a memorable experience for clients that consistently meets their goals.
Laura Hanichak Gregg is director of practice management and advisor research at FlexShares and host of The Flexible Advisor Podcast
Take a look at our comprehensive guide to the best and most popular information ebooks and products available today on Detoxing, Colon Cleansing, Weight Loss and Dating and Romance. They are all in one spot, easy to find and compere to make a quick selection for the product that best fits your needs or wants.
So browse through a category and make your preferred selection and come back here to read more choice articles and get a few more helpful tips on ways to help your enhancement.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. “saubiosaubiosuccess.com is a participant in third party affiliate and advertising programs; The Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, Awin network, and other affiliate advertising programs are designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees and commissions by advertising and linking to products on other sites and on Amazon.com. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc, or its affiliates.”
We use anonymous cookies and various 3rd-party services to optimise and to offer you a better, more personalised, browsing experience with advanced accessibility enhancements.
Dismiss
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
