With Regulation Best Interest’s implementation set for June 30 of next year, there remains a question that’s not yet answerable, according to Mark Cresap, the president of Cresap Inc., and it could have a massive impact on the brokerage industry.
“We have all these concerns, but the thing we don’t know is how Reg BI is going to be enforced. If regulators come in guns blazing, it’s going to be very difficult to maintain the transaction-based model,” he said at FINRA’s Regulation Best Interest conference in Washington, D.C. “So a lot of this depends on what is now unknowable, which is how regulators are going to approach this in the examination process.”
But in a little more than six months, brokers will begin to find out, as the implementation date arrives. At the conference, which attracted hundreds of brokers and compliance officers from throughout the country, FINRA and SEC regulators detailed what they would be looking for in the early days of Reg BI’s enforcement.
According to John Polise, the associate director of the Broker-Dealer and Exchange Program at the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations, brokers need to understand that regulators would not be playing “gotcha.”
“I think I would say we’re mostly looking for good faith efforts in trying to comply with the rules,” he said. “Now, there’s a continuum here. If we go into your firm and say, ‘how are you doing with BI compliance?’ and you say, ‘what’s BI?’...that’s going to be tough.”
However, Polise said that starting on July 1, firms should not be surprised if an examiner arrives inquiring about compliance.
According to Scott Gilbert, the vice president and district director at FINRA’s New York District Office, firms should expect examiners from his regulatory agency to be testing that firms are complying with the four mandated obligations (disclosure, care, conflict of interest and compliance), and FINRA would use “typical examination methods” familiar to firms, including interviews, document requests and testing, to evaluate compliance.
Additionally, some exams’ review periods would encompass time before and after the implementation date, and that while they will judge firms’ behavior before implementation under the suitability standards, firms should not think that they will not address “traditionally unacceptable behavior” in the runup to Reg BI.
“When we say things like ‘good faith,’ we have to mean it. I think in the first round there will be much less ‘you did this wrong’ and more ‘how about this?” Polise said. “You’ll always have a tradeoff between ‘I want a strict rule’ and ‘flexibility.’ There’s a sweet spot we’ll have to find together, and we are all in this together.”
In the next several months, the SEC will be including questions on their exams of firms to help firms assess how they’re progressing toward implementation, according to Peter Driscoll, the director of the SEC’s Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations. Additionally, the commission would likely publish findings drawn from examinations in the first year of implementation to give firms more opportunities to achieve compliance. Driscoll said he was already seeing firms starting to gauge how the rule would change their practices.
“We’re seeing positive movement, at least from my perspective, on people engaging in this and trying to get it right,” he said. “I’m not panicked.”
In the past, SEC regulators have repeatedly stressed that brokers shouldn’t expect a delay in implementation, and Alicia Goldin, a senior special counsel in the Office of Chief Counsel in the SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets, told conference attendees there were “no plans” to delay the date when firms must submit a Form CRS (which is also June 30).
Nevertheless, Tim Howard, a compliance officer with BancWest Investment Services, said he thought a delay was quite possible. According to Howard, creating the Form CRS and writing new policies and procedures would not be the most burdensome aspect of implementation. Instead, he said it was proving difficult to assess the appropriate level of disclosure when detailing conflicts of interest.
“What is too much disclosure? What’s not enough disclosure? What is too detailed for conflicts of interest and what’s not?” he said. “I’m not too worried about [Form CRS], I’m worried about missing a key disclosure, something the SEC feels is important that we missed.”
According to Wendy Lanton, the chief compliance officer for Lantern Wealth, smaller firms like hers may face greater hurdles in attaining compliance, particularly in how they keep records of client interactions, recommendations and trades. While larger firms may be able to document everything in house, smaller firms may need to rely on their clearing firms. But if clearing firms do not supply the ability to do that, it can make things very difficult for smaller brokers to keep pace.
Lanton, who called Reg BI “the most sweeping change” she’d ever seen in the industry, said that while the rule had good ideas, she wished it had been implemented in a more piecemeal fashion.
“We have to find a way to make it less clunky, and we can’t raise fees on customers,” she said. “We live in an industry of price compression.”
Take a look at our comprehensive guide to the best and most popular information ebooks and products available today on Detoxing, Colon Cleansing, Weight Loss and Dating and Romance. They are all in one spot, easy to find and compere to make a quick selection for the product that best fits your needs or wants.
So browse through a category and make your preferred selection and come back here to read more choice articles and get a few more helpful tips on ways to help your enhancement.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases. “saubiosaubiosuccess.com is a participant in third party affiliate and advertising programs; The Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, Awin network, and other affiliate advertising programs are designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees and commissions by advertising and linking to products on other sites and on Amazon.com. Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc, or its affiliates.”
We use anonymous cookies and various 3rd-party services to optimise and to offer you a better, more personalised, browsing experience with advanced accessibility enhancements.
Dismiss
Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
